CIESIN Home Page SEDAC Home Page MVA Home Page

This Information Product is Undergoing Alpha Test

[HOME] [PREVIOUS] [NEXT] [UP] [BOTTOM] [FAQ] [NAV]


Reproduced with permission, from: Edmonds, J.A., M.A. Wise, and C.N. MacCracken. 1994. Advanced Energy Technologies and Climate Change: An Analysis Using the Global Change Assess ment Model (GCAM). Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.


Disclaimer statement from PNL

Advanced Energy Technologies and Climate Change: An Analysis Using the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM)

J.A. Edmonds
M.A. Wise
C.N. MacCracken

May 1994


V. CONCLUSIONS

We report results from a "top down" energy-economy model employing "bottom up" assumptions and embedded in an integrated assessment framework, the GCAM. The analysis shows that from the perspective of long-term energy system development, differences in re sults from the "top down" and "bottom up" research communities would appear to be more closely linked to differences in assumptions regarding the economic cost associated with advanced technologies than to differences in modeling approach.

The adoption of assumptions regarding advanced energy technologies were shown to have a profound effect on the future rate of anthropogenic climate change. The cumulative effect of the five sets of advanced energy technologies is to reduce annual emissio ns from fossil fuel use to levels which stabilize atmospheric concentrations below 550 ppmv, the point at which atmospheric concentrations are double those that existed in the middle of the eighteenth century.

This work has led us to the conclusion that differences in the long term results obtained by "top-down" and "bottom-up" modelers can be attributed largely to differences in assumptions. Methodology plays a less important role in explaining differences. The single most important question is whether or not the advanced energy supply technologies described in Cases 2 through 6 will be available in the quantities and at the costs assumed in this study.

While all energy technologies introduced in Cases 2 through 6 play roles in reducing future fossil fuel CO2 emissions, the introduction of advanced biomass energy production technology plays a critical role. If biomass energy can be made available at $2.4 0/GJ or less in quantities sufficient to make it the core energy supply technology in the middle of the next century, then emissions can be cut dramatically relative to Case 1. The problem of emissions reduction becomes one of technology development and d eployment in this case, and not one of fiscal and regulatory intervention.

Because SO2 has a cooling effect on the atmosphere, policies which reduce fossil fuel use are not as effective as a simple greenhouse calculation might imply. The proper treatment of SO2 is therefore an important consideration in the analysis of climate c onsequences of technology development and deployment.


(a) Solar electricity is a general category which includes technologies all non-carbon emitting electricity technologies other than nuclear, hydro, and biomass. Thus fusion, wind, geothermal, and OTEC are included in addition to photovoltaic and power tower technologies.

(b) Personal communication. 1994.


VI. REFERENCES

Edmonds, J. and Barns, D.W. 1990. Estimating the Marginal Cost of Reducing Global Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions: PNL-SA-18361, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

Edmonds, J. and Barns, D.W. 1992. "Factors Affecting the Long-term Cost of Global Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions Reductions," International Journal of Global Energy Issues,4(3): 140-166.

Edmonds, J. and Reilly, J. 1985. Global Energy: Assessing the Future, Oxford University Press, New York.

Edmonds. J.A., Reilly, J.M., Gardner, R.H., and Brenkert, A. 1986. Uncertainty in Future Global Energy Use and Fossil Fuel C02 Emissions 1975 to 2075. TR036, DO3/NBB-0081 Dist. Category UC-11, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce. Springfield Virginia 22161.

Grubb. M., J. Edmonds, P. ten Brink, and M. Morrison. 1993. "The Costs of Limiting Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: A Survey and Analysis," Annual Review of Energy and Environment. 18:397 478.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1992. Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. J.T. Houghton. B.A. Callander and S.K. Varney (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Johansson T.B., H. Kelly, A.N. Reddy, R.H. Williams, eds. 1993. Renewables for Fuels and Electricity. The United Nations Solar Energy Group for Environment and Development, n.d.

Maier-Reimer, E., and Hasselmann, K. 1987. "Transport and Storage of CO2 in the Ocean: An Inorganic Ocean-Circulation Carbon Cycle Model," Climate Dynamics. 2:63-90.

Shine. K.P., Derwent, R.G., Wuebbles, D.J. and Morcrette. J.-J. 1990. The IPCC Scientific Assessment. (eds. Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J.):41-68. Cambridge University Press, London.

Wigley, T.M.L. and S.C.B. Raper. 1987. "Thermal expansion of seawater associated with global warming." Nature. 330:127-131.

Wigley, T.M.L., and S.C.B. Raper. 1992. "Implications for Climate and Sea Level of Revised IPCC Emissions Scenarios." Nature. Vol. 357.

Williams, R.H. 1994a, Biomass Energy Conversion Technologies for Large-scale Power Generation and Transport Fuels Applications. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

Williams, R.H. 1994b. Photovoltaic Technologies. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

Wisniewski, J. and A.E. Lugo (Eds.). 1992. Natural Sinks of CO2 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.


[SEDAC] [PREVIOUS] [NEXT] [TOP]

Acknowledgement

This work, including access to the data and technical assistance, is provided by CIESIN, with funding from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Contract NAS5-32632 for the Development and Operation of the Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).

Data Errors, Corrections and Disclaimer
CIESIN follows procedures designed to ensure that data disseminated in CIESIN's Host are of reasonable quality. If, despite these procedures, users encounter apparent misstatements in CIESIN's Host, they should contact CIESIN Customer Services at 517/797-2614 or via Internet e-mail at CIESIN.Info@ciesin.org. CIESIN will notify the original data provider of the apparent errors or misstatements, and will attempt to correct any errors or misstatements. Neither CIESIN nor NASA verifies or guarantees the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the data provided.

Text Browser Utilities:
[CIESIN Home Page, CIESIN Gateway, Compass, User Services, Register, FAQs, Full-Text Search]


For more information contact CIESIN User Services: e-mail: CIESIN.Info@ciesin.org; Tel: 1-517-797-2727.

Configuration control information:
mcpaper-sec5.htmlpp Version 1.5. Last updated 05/06 1996.