This Information Product is
Undergoing Alpha Test
Thematic Guide to Integrated Assessment Modeling
Future Emissions Paths
Future climate change depends on the future path of world
emissions, which any integrated assessment study must somehow project.
Methods used to do so largely fall into three classes: external
specification of emission scenarios, detailed representation of
technologies, and aggregate economic modeling.
External Specification of Scenarios
Many studies specify externally a few representative scenarios of
emission time-paths, either as discretely specified separate futures
(often four, to discourage the reader from taking the middle of three as a
prediction) or as points on a probability distribution of future
emissions. Scenarios may be drawn from other studies or from
authoritative quasi-governmental sources such as the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It is usual and advantageous for
different assessments to use common input scenarios, to standardize their
inputs and permit controlled comparison of results. Emission scenarios are
most often used when the assessment focuses on other, downstream aspects
of the climate issue. While scenarios may reflect causal modeling of
emissions done in the study that originated them, this modeling is
normally inaccessible when its results are imported as scenarios.
Consequently, studies based on emissions scenarios can normally do only
limited investigation of policies to change emission paths.
Specification of Technologies That Generate Emissions
The second approach is detailed specification of the technologies
that generate emissions, often called "bottom-up" modeling. In this
approach, the present and future mix of technologies in each economic
sector is described by its costs, inputs, and outputs, including emissions.
Descriptions can be at levels of aggregation ranging from broad economic
sectors down to individual plants. The advantage of this approach is that
it allows precise specification of particular known or projected technical
innovations. For example, one can specify that a particular kind of
combined-cycle gas turbine for electrical generation will be available in
the year 2005, with specified cost, efficiency, and CO2 emissions. But the
approach can require specifying time-paths of huge numbers of technical
coefficients, risking arbitrariness and spurious precision.
Economic Modeling With Embedded Emissions Coefficients
The third approach is economic modeling with embedded emission
coefficients, projecting future emissions as the outcome of specified
production relationships, preferences, and aggregate growth. This approach
permits the effect of economic policies to be represented, through the
dependence of emitting activities on prices and incomes. Detail can range
from simple models of the aggregate economy, through aggregate models
coupled to more detailed representation of the energy sector, through full
dynamic general equilibrium models. The most basic design issues in
economic modeling of future emissions include whether agents have
foresight and how they make decisions over time (including whether they
are able to make labor-leisure and consumption-saving decisions as well as
commodity consumption decisions); how capital is structured and vintaged,
and whether it is malleable once invested; the degree of disaggregation
among world regions and how they interact through flows of capital,
people, and goods; and perhaps most fundamental, the extent to which
common determinants of behavior are assumed to hold in all world regions,
e.g., the basis on which investment decisions are made.
Other Considerations
Mixtures of these three approaches are possible. Some studies, for
example, model trends in CO2 emissions but use scenarios for other gases.
Others combine an aggregate model of the economy with enough technical
detail in certain emission-intensive sectors, such as agriculture or
energy production, that specific new technologies can be added to the
economy.
An important question in projecting emissions, which cuts across
these approaches, is which emissions are tracked. Some assessments project
only CO2; others project all greenhouse emissions, but express them in a
simple CO2-equivalent metric; others specify emissions of each major
greenhouse gas separately. It is becoming increasingly clear that detailed
atmospheric modeling requires specifying emissions of aerosols as well as
greenhouse gases, and that local air-pollutant emissions can also be
implicated in determining changes in radiative forcing.
The next page is Technological Change.
Sources
Parson, E.A. and K. Fisher-Vanden, Searching for Integrated Assessment:
A Preliminary Investigation of Methods, Models, and Projects in the
Integrated Assessment of Global Climatic Change. Consortium for
International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). University
Center, Mich. 1995.
Suggested Citation
Consortium for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN).
1995. Thematic Guide to Integrated Assessment Modeling of Climate
Change [online]. University Center, Mich.
CIESIN URL: http://sedac.ciesin.org/mva/iamcc.tg/TGHP.html
Acknowledgement
This work, including access to the data and technical assistance, is
provided by CIESIN, with funding from the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration under Contract NAS5-32632 for the Development and
Operation of the Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC).
Data Errors, Corrections and Disclaimer
CIESIN follows procedures designed to ensure that data disseminated via CIESIN
Web site are of reasonable quality. If, despite these procedures, users
encounter apparent errors in CIESIN data, they should contact CIESIN User
Services at 517/797-2727 or via Internet e-mail at CIESIN.Info@ciesin.org.
CIESIN will notify the original data provider of these apparent errors or misstatements
and will attempt to correct them in the most efficient manner possible. Neither
CIESIN nor NASA verifies or guarantees the accuracy, reliability, or
completeness of the data provided.
For more information contact CIESIN User Services: e-mail: CIESIN.Info@ciesin.org; Tel:
1-517-797-2727.
Configuration control information:
TGsec3-2-1.htmlpp Version 1.8. Last updated 01/06 1996.